Legal Opinion

In Re Zahn

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1980No. 53443PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ryan

The petitioner, Herbert Zahn, seeks to be reinstated to the roll of attorneys admitted to practice law in Illinois. He filed a petition for reinstatement pursuant to our Rule 767. (73 Ill. 2d R. 767.) Zahn was licensed to practice law in Illinois in 1953. He was disbarred in 1970. The amended complaint which was filed in the disciplinary proceeding had charged Zahn with the misappropriation and conversion to his own use of certain monies of three clients. It also charged Zahn with having commingled the funds of one of the clients. The amount of the money involved was over $30,000. Zahn was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re ClayterIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  2. In Re WigodaIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  3. In Re LaPinskaIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  4. In Re LeonardIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  5. In Re ThomasIllinois Supreme Court · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In Re KutaIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. In Re TeichnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  3. In Re BerkleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  4. In Re AnglinIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  5. In Re AlexanderIllinois Supreme Court · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API