Legal Opinion

In Re Berkley

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1983No. 57374PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Underwood

The petitioner, Irwin Martin Berkley, was disbarred on consent (73 Ill. 2d R. 762) on September 26, 1973, shortly after his conviction in the Federal court of suborning perjury and his plea of guilty to charges of mail fraud and conspiracy to commit mail fraud. He filed a petition for reinstatement on September 22, 1980, pursuant to our Rule 767 (73 Ill. 2d R. 767). Following an evidentiary hearing, the Hearing Board of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission recommended that the petition be denied “on the sole ground that there has been no attempt at restitution.” Petitioner…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re AndrosIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  2. In Re WigodaIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  3. In Re KutaIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  4. In Re ZahnIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  5. In Re SilvernIllinois Supreme Court · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In Re ImmingIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  2. In Re GlenvilleIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  3. In Re AnglinIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  4. In Re AlexanderIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  5. In Re CarnowIllinois Supreme Court · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API