Legal Opinion
Berry v. Struble
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 12, 1937No. Civ. 10217PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of nonsuit entered in an action to recover damages for personal injuries.
The injuries grew out of a collision between an automobile, in which the plaintiff was riding, and a car driven by the defendant. The accident occurred on November 9, 1934. The question of defendant’s negligence is not involved in the appeal. The evidence shows that the plaintiff received a blow on the leg due to the fact that it came in contact with some part of the car in which she was riding. It was treated by a physician, and on December 5, 1934, the injury appeared…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- O'Meara v. HaidenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Richardson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Althoff v. TorrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Hudgins v. Standard Oil Co. of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Houston v. TrowerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Suckow Borax Mines Consolidated, Inc. v. Borax Consolidated, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Casey v. ProctorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Ruggles v. SelbyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960
- Vicente L. Morta Fhp, Inc. v. Korea Insurance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Matthews v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.