Legal Opinion
Sapulpa Petroleum Co. v. McCray
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 19, 1929No. 19077PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
This is a second appeal in this cause. _ See McCray v. Sapulpa Pet. Co. et al., 102 Okla. 108, 226 Pac. 875, and consolidated eases.
McCray sought specific performance for the conveyance of two oil and gas leases known as the Timothy & Cedar leases. He was in possession and had developed the same. Prior to August. 1919, McCray, Birch C. Burnett, and Bates B. Burnett each owned one-third of the stock in the sapulpa Petroleum Company as a Delaware corporation. In the year 1919, said owners of said stock decided to incorporate the Cushing Petroleum Company as a Delaware corporation. A portion of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Searl v. School Dist. No. 2 in Lake Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Cressler v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Good v. First Nat. Bank of RoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Probst v. BearmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Alaska Placer Company v. LeeAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Dilworth v. FortierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Edwards v. LachmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- Ft. Dearborn Trust & Sav. Bank v. Skelly Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Miller v. Tidal Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.