Legal Opinion
Miller v. Tidal Oil Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 20, 1932No. 21431PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
The subject-matter out of which this' appeal arises has twice been before this court. Certain land in Creek county was allotted to Robert Marshall, a minor Creek freedman. Sometime; abo'ut 1909, while a minor, Robert Marshall was married and thereafter a decree was entered in the district coturt of Creek county conferring majority rights upon him. He then, while under the age of 21 years, executed certain instruments purporting to convey a portion of said land and the oil and gas rights therein and an option to purchase, the remaining interest in said land. His. grantees thereafter executed…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Woodworth v. FranklinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Tidal Oil Company v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Cosden Pipe Line Co. v. BerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Barnes v. Winona Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Whitney v. HuntingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Alaska Placer Company v. LeeAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- White v. Conoco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- White v. ConocoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Dilworth v. FortierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Greer v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. GreerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.