Beneficial Finance Co. v. Crane
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtPruyn, J.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover the balance alleged to be due on a promissory note made by the defendant. The defendant’s answer set forth his discharge in bankruptcy as a special defense, to which the plaintiff replied that the financial statement furnished by the defendant was false and was relied on by the plaintiff and the debt was not dischargeable in bankruptcy. On a trial to the court, it found the issues for the defendant, and from the judgment and the denial of a motion to open the judgment the plaintiff has appealed, assigning as error the conclusions of the court and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bridgeport Hydraulic Co. v. SciortinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Shakro v. HaddadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Mercier v. American Refractories & Crucible CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- Gorman v. American Sumatra Tobacco CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- M-A-C Loan Plan, Inc. v. CooperConnecticut Superior Court · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gonzales v. Aetna Finance Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1970
- Beneficial Finance Co. v. MachieConnecticut Appellate Court · 1969
- Consolidated Plan of Connecticut, Inc. v. CrossConnecticut Appellate Court · 1967
- Adamowicz v. StevensConnecticut Appellate Court · 1969