Legal Opinion
M-A-C Loan Plan, Inc. v. Cooper
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided December 15, 1961No. File No. CV 10-615-366PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff sued the defendants for the balance due on a promissory note together with accrued interest. The execution and terms of the note are admitted; there is no dispute as to the amount due, except as the obligation may be unenforceable against defendant David E. Cooper, because of the specially pleaded defense of a discharge in bankruptcy. This defense has been denied on the ground that the debt was incurred through a materially false financial statement as to defendants' financial condition and was, therefore, not dischargeable in bankruptcy.
On June 14, 1960, the defendants executed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Samet v. Farmers' & Merchants' Nat. Bank of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1917
- Morton v. SniderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- Mullen v. First Nat. Bank of Ardmore, Okl.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
- Personal Finance Co. of Shreveport v. MurphyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1951
- Personal Finance Co. of NJ v. BrunsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- First Credit Corp. v. WellnitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Federal Finance Co. v. MerkelWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- M-A-C Loan Plan, Inc. v. CraneConnecticut Appellate Court · 1966
- Local Industrial Finance Company v. McDougaleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966
- Household Finance Corporation v. WaltersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.