Legal Opinion
Shakro v. Haddad
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 28, 1961PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlcorn, J.
This is an action for damages, in two counts, against the named defendant, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, the defendant’s wife, hereinafter referred to as Mabel, and the defendant’s son, hereinafter referred to as Conrad. The first count is for money owed by the defendant. The second count is based on a note allegedly signed by all three defendants. All the defendants filed a general denial. Mabel and Conrad filed a special defense alleging that they received no consideration for executing the note. Judgment was rendered for the de fendant on the first count and for the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brown v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Saunders v. SaundersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- State v. AnnunziatoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Knapp v. Tidewater Coal Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- Tyler v. ToddSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1869
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- State v. SpigaroloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. WatsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Cecio Bros., Inc. v. FeldmannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- National Broadcasting Co. v. RoseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Charlton Press, Inc. v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.