Legal Opinion

Consolidated Plan of Connecticut, Inc. v. Cross

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 16, 1967No. File No. CV 2-6410-31118PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorton M. Levine, J.

Plaintiff commenced an action against defendants, husband and wife, based on their execution of a promissory note. The answer of defendants admitted the execution of the note but pleaded as a special defense that the debt due from defendant David Cross, Jr., was discharged by bankruptcy of said defendant. The reply of plaintiff alleged that said defendant was not discharged, pursuant to the provisions of § 17 (a) (2) of the Bankruptcy Act, contending that the loan was procured by false and misleading statements of defendant David Cross, Jr., as to his financial condition. No such defense was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bradley v. OviattSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
  2. Helming v. KashakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  3. Public Finance Corp. v. XarhakosConnecticut Appellate Court · 1964
  4. Beneficial Finance Co. v. CraneConnecticut Appellate Court · 1967

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gonzales v. Aetna Finance Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Beneficial Finance Co. v. MachieConnecticut Appellate Court · 1969
  3. Army Aviation Center Federal Credit Union v. Call (In re Call)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Alabama · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API