Legal Opinion

Alaska Pacific Assurance Co. v. Collins

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1990No. S-2978, S-2986PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RABINO WITZ, Justice.

INTRODUCTION.

Alaska Pacific Assurance Company (“Al-pac”), and Insurance Company of North America (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Alpac”), appeal from a judgment based on special verdicts in which the jury found Alpac liable for: (1) negligently depriving Eldon Collins of the benefits of an insurance agreement; (2) violating the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in denying Collins such benefits; and (3) breaching its contractual duty to provide insurance coverage and to defend Collins.

Collins’ claims against Alpac arose out of his construction and…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Love v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Brandt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Uptegraft v. Home Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  5. Gene & Harvey Builders, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. K & K RECYCLING, INC. v. Alaska Gold Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Municipality of Anchorage v. GentileAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. 2002 Lawrence R. Buchalter Alaska Trust v. Philadelphia Financial Life Assurance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  4. Sykes v. Melba Creek Mining, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. C.P. Ex Rel. M.L. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API