Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Keys

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 28, 1990No. 988PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge:

In this case, we hold that when counsel of record fails to formally and properly withdraw as counsel after sentence but before the expiration of the time for filing of notice of appeal, yet counsel nonetheless ceases active representation, then quashal of an appeal as the result of a defect in a pro se notice of appeal will be deemed the procedural default of counsel of record. Such was the case here; consequently, we grant appellant the right to appeal nunc pro tunc.

The relevant facts and procedural history may be summarized as follows. Appellant was charged, tried and convicted…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Commonwealth v. MirandaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Szudora v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. CiottoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. QuailSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. CastroSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Commonwealth v. WhiteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Commonwealth v. FordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Commonwealth v. PetersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API