Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Ciotto

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 13, 1989No. 374PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge:

Appellant, Joseph Ciotto, appeals from judgment of sentence imposed following his jury trial convictions of terroristic threats and harassment by communication relating to a series of abusive telephone calls to his estranged wife. We vacate and remand for the filing of post-verdict motions nunc pro tunc.

The relevant facts are not in dispute. Appellant was found guilty of the above offenses on November 20, 1987. On November 30, 1987, appellant’s court appointed counsel filed post-verdict motions. However, because counsel failed to file any brief in support of the post-verdict…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. McClendonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Commonwealth v. SullivanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. MirandaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Commonwealth v. OsteenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Commonwealth v. HarrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Commonwealth v. FranklinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Commonwealth v. MostellerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Commonwealth v. HernandezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Commonwealth v. HoymanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API