Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Quail

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 24, 1999PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrosky, J.

¶ 1 This is an appeal from an order denying appellant relief under the PCRA. Appellant asserts that he lost his appeal rights due to counsel’s ineffectiveness, that his plea was unlawfully induced and that the sentence imposed was disproportionate to that given his co-defendant’s. We remand for the provision of counsel and the filing of a counseled brief.

¶2 On February 19, 1997, appellant, represented by George J. D’Ambrosio, Esquire, pled guilty to a count of burglary and a count of aggravated assault. Both charges arose from a break-in of Michael Tyman’s residence and subsequent assault…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HamptonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Commonwealth v. KeysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KaranicolasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Commonwealth v. RobinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Commonwealth v. KutnyakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Commonwealth v. EvansSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API