Commonwealth v. Quail
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the CourtBrosky, J.
¶ 1 This is an appeal from an order denying appellant relief under the PCRA. Appellant asserts that he lost his appeal rights due to counsel’s ineffectiveness, that his plea was unlawfully induced and that the sentence imposed was disproportionate to that given his co-defendant’s. We remand for the provision of counsel and the filing of a counseled brief.
¶2 On February 19, 1997, appellant, represented by George J. D’Ambrosio, Esquire, pled guilty to a count of burglary and a count of aggravated assault. Both charges arose from a break-in of Michael Tyman’s residence and subsequent assault…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HamptonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Commonwealth v. KeysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
3Cited by54 opinions
- Commonwealth v. KaranicolasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. RobinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. KutnyakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Commonwealth v. EvansSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.