Legal Opinion
Bank of Santa Fe v. Petty
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided December 13, 1993No. 13785PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
APODACA, Judge.
The Bank of Santa Fe (Plaintiff or the bank)'filed a motion for rehearing after the filing of our opinion in this appeal on November 3, 1993. Although we have denied the motion for rehearing, our previous opinion filed November 3, 1993 is withdrawn and the following opinion is substituted in its place.
Plaintiff appeals the trial court’s dismissal of its claims under SCRA 1986, 1-041(B) (Repl.1992), following the presentation of Plaintiffs evidence. SCRA 1-041(B) provides for dismissal at the close of a plaintiffs case when “no right to relief’ has been shown. Plaintiff…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bangor Punta Operations, Inc. v. Bangor & Aroostook RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Home Fire Insurance v. BarberNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
- Schreiber v. BryanCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1978
- Dawson v. DawsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Carter v. Burn Construction Company, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Midland Food Services, LLC v. Castle Hill Holdings V, LLCCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1999
- Borne v. Gonstead Advanced Techniques, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
- Johnson v. Public Employees Retirement Board of the Public Employees Retirement Ass'nNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- Rienhardt v. KellyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
- Borne v. Gonstead Advanced Techniques, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003