Midland Food Services, LLC v. Castle Hill Holdings V, LLC
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STRINE, Vice Chancellor.
In this action, the Midland Companies seek to recover damages and obtain other relief from their prior owner-operator, Ronald Saverin, and defendants affiliated with Saverin. The Midland Companies base all of their claims on Saverin’s actions while he was their owner and operator. Because the current owner of the Midland Companies was assigned its interest from corporations that acquired their shares directly from Saverin, after his alleged wrongdoing occurred, I find that the Mid land Companies’ claims are barred by the doctrine articulated by the United States…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
- In Re Santa Fe Pacific Corp. Shareholder LitigationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
- Grimes v. DonaldSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
- Bangor Punta Operations, Inc. v. Bangor & Aroostook RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Vanderbilt Income & Growth Associates, L.L.C. v. Arvida/JMB Managers, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Winshall v. Viacom International Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2013
- Werner v. Miller Technology Management, L.P.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2003
- In re El Paso Pipeline Partners, L.P. Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2015
- Tow v. Amegy Bank N.A.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
- Bamford v. Penfold, L.P.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2020
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.