Legal Opinion
Smith v. Ashland, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided February 2, 2000No. 98-1290 (DWF/AJB)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
FRANK, District Judge.
Introduction
The above-entitled matter came on for hearing before the undersigned United States District Judge on January 21, 2000, pursuant to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment of all claims and Defendant’s Motion to Strike Affidavits. In the Complaint, Plaintiff alleges discrimination based on race and gender, sexual harassment, reprisal, and battery. For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is granted and Defendant’s Motion to Strike Affidavits is denied as moot.
Background
Defendant Ashland Inc.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United Air Lines, Inc. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Donna Krenik v. County of Le SueurCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Onyiah v. St. Cloud State UniversityDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
- LaMont v. Independent School District 728Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Radcliffe v. Securian Financial Group, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2012