Legal Opinion
LaMont v. Independent School District 728
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 16, 2012No. A10-0543PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEYER, Justice.
Appellant Carol LaMont filed suit against her employer, Independent School District #728 (the School District), for violations of the Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA), Minn.Stat. ch. 363A (2010). LaMont claimed that she had been subjected to a hostile work environment based on her sex and that she had suffered sexual harassment. The district court granted summary judgment to the School District on both claims, concluding that a hostile work environment based on sex was not actionable, and even if it were, LaMont had not established that the conduct of the School…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Darla G. Hall, Patty J. Baxter and Jeannette Ticknor v. Gus Construction Co., Inc. And John MundorfCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- Gloria S. Carter v. Chrysler Corporation United Auto Workers, Local 110Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Citizens State Bank Norwood Young America v. Gordon BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Rasmussen v. Two Harbors Fish Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Luisa Chavez-Lavagnino v. Motivation Education TrainingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- In re the Estate of PawlikCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- Nicole LaPoint v. Family Orthodontics, P. A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.