Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Frazier

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 20, 1970No. 17513PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BATEMAN, Justice.

The appellant J. E. Stewart was the defendant in this property damage suit arising out of an automoble collision, and appeals from the judgment rendered in favor of appellee James F. Frazier in a nonjury trial. Appellant raises two points of error on appeal.

The first complains of the action of the trial court in deeming appellee’s request for admissions Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 as admitted because of appellant’s failure either to admit or deny the truth thereof. Pursuant to Rule 169, Vernon’s Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, appellant was requested to admit, inter alia, that at the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pasadena State Bank v. IsaacTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Campbell v. PeacockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. Barstow v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  4. Cree v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  5. Merrill v. TropoliCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Humes v. Hallmark, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995
  2. Aatco Transmission Co. v. Hollins, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984
  3. Putman v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  4. Darla Humes v. Thomas Hallmark, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995
  5. in Re Terri Cox Ferguson, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API