Legal Opinion

Barstow v. Jackson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 29, 1968No. 14689PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KLINGEMAN, Justice.

Suit by Robert E. Jackson against Clemence C. Barstow for damages to his automobile arising from a collision between their vehicles. Tindall Pontiac, Inc., intervened asserting that by virtue of an agreement between Tindall and Jackson, Tindall was entitled to recover the sum of $513.67 for certain repairs done to plaintiff’s automobile by Tindall, out of any amount which plaintiff might recover against defendant, and plaintiff and intervener stipulated in open court that plaintiff was bound by such agreement. Trial was to the court without a jury. Defendant admitted…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pasadena State Bank v. IsaacTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Isbell v. Kenyon-Warner Dredging Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Foley Bros. Dry Goods Co. v. SettegastCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  4. Magee Heirs v. SlackTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  5. McConnico v. Texas Power & Light CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  2. Davila v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. Tom Benson Chevrolet, Inc. v. AlvaradoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  4. Chrysler Corp. v. McMorries, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1983
  5. Hochheim Prairie Farm Mutual Insurance Ass'n v. BurnettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API