Legal Opinion

Humes v. Hallmark

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided March 15, 1995No. 03-93-00589-CVPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant Darla Humes appeals from a judgment rendered on a jury verdict in favor of appellee Thomas Hallmark on claims of common-law conversion and of wrongful seizure under Tex.Prop.Code § 54.046 (West Supp.1995). The jury awarded Hallmark damages of $18,020 for the converted property, attorney’s fees of $11,000, exemplary damages of $6,000 and $200 for a security deposit that was never returned. Humes brings six points of error, all of which complain that there is no evidence, or insufficient evidence, to support the jury finding of the value of the converted property. We will affirm the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Alm v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1986

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. GJP, INC. v. Ghosh, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
  2. Santanna Natural Gas Corp. and Women's Natural Gas Corp. v. Hamon Operating Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
  3. Arroyo Shrimp Farm, Inc. v. Hung Shrimp Farm, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1996
  4. Travis Central Appraisal District v. FM Properties Operating Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
  5. GJP, Inc. Richard D. Herting Classic Jaguar, Inc. and Dan Mooney v. Avijit Ghosh, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API