Legal Opinion

Putman v. Sanders

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 30, 1976No. 8663PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REYNOLDS, Justice.

Doris Sanders recovered a money judgment against Joe Putman for damage sustained to her automobile while it was in the possession of Putman who had repaired it at the request of her son. The trial court’s determinations of a bailment and the amount of damage have the requisite evi-dentiary support to hold Putman liable because he failed to rebut the presumption of his negligence. Affirmed.

In January of 1974, Doris Sanders purchased a 1969 Buick automobile for $1,195. She agreed to permit her son, Don Sanders, to use the Buick for job transportation on the condition that he…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gevinson v. Manhattan Construction Co. of OklahomaTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Buchanan v. ByrdTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Trammell v. WhitlockTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  4. McConnico v. Texas Power & Light CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  5. Barstow v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wright v. GernandtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  2. Bower v. Processor and Chemical Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  3. Lufkin Industries, Inc. v. Mission Chevrolet, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Wright v. GernandtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API