State v. . Johnson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
The questions presented are whether the cases as made can survive the demurrers. Specifically, the question posed by Primus is whether the evidence shows force sufficient on bis. part to constitute rape; and the question raised by Johnson is whether the evidence renders him a participant in the capital offense. the defendants concede that they conspired to get money by bold-up and robbery on the night in question, but they contend that any additional crime was in excess of their original design. S. v. Trammell, 24 N. C., 379. Cf. S. v. Smith, 221 N. C., 400, 20 S. E. (2d), 360; S. v. Bell,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- State v. . BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- State v. . RountreeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- State v. . AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. OvermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. ArnoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- State v. MurrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.