Legal Opinion

State v. Murry

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 14, 1970No. 5PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOBBITT, Chief Justice.

The act of “carnally knowing and abusing any female child under the age of twelve years” is rape. G.S. 14-21; State v. Monds, 130 N.C. 697, 41 S.E. 789; State v. Johnson, 226 N.C. 671, 40 S.E. 2d 113. Neither force, State v. Johnson, 226 N.C. 266, 37 S.E. 2d 678, nor intent, State v. Gibson, 221 N.C. 252, 20 S.E. 2d 51, are elements of this offense.

“The terms ‘carnal knowledge’ and ‘sexual intercourse’ are synonymous. There is ‘carnal knowledge’ or ‘sexual intercourse’ in a legal sense if there is the slightest penetration of the sexual organ of the female by the sexual…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. State v. Marshall Norman HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  4. State v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  5. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State v. HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. State v. JarretteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. LP v. Natrona County Department of Public Assistance & Social ServicesWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. ThackerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API