Legal Opinion
Woodring v. Jennings State Bank
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided March 1, 1985No. CV82-O-691PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
URBOM, Chief Judge.
The plaintiff and the defendant have filed motions for summary judgment, filings 26 and 24.
Under Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the moving party bears the burden of showing that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. All doubts are to be resolved against the moving party, and the non-moving party is to receive the benefit of all favorable inferences that reasonably may be drawn from the evidence. Walling v. Fairmont Creamery Co., 139 F.2d 318,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Broadmoor Apts. of Charleston v. HorwitzSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Ruscitti v. SackheimColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
- Cristopher K. Crowley v. WTC LLC, Leslie William Fogg, and Michele RennieDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2025
- Hill v. U.S. Bank Home MortgageDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2024