Legal Opinion

Broadmoor Apts. of Charleston v. Horwitz

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 16, 1991No. 23529PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chandler, Justice:

Respondents-Appellants, Broadmoor Apartments and Town and Campus International (Broadmoor), instituted suit against Appellants-Respondents, Lanny Horwitz, Berkeley Square Associates, and Max Schlopy, alleging (1) slander of title and (2) abuse of process. The trial court, by directed verdict, dismissed the slander of title action; on abuse of process, Broadmoor was awarded $750,000. All parties appeal.

We affirm.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Town and Campus, as General Partner of Broadmoor, entered into negotiations with Max Schlopy for the purchase of Broadmoor’s 305-unit apartment…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Graham v. WhitakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  2. McGann v. AllenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  3. Wood v. GravesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  4. Huggins v. Winn-Dixie Greenville, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  5. Hofer v. St. ClairSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Alan Grayson v. Randolph AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
  2. D.R. Horton, Inc. v. Wescott Land Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
  3. Davis v. EptingCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
  4. Hainer v. American Medical International, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  5. Hainer v. American Medical International, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API