Legal Opinion
Ruscitti v. Sackheim
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided August 29, 1991No. 90CA0846PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge ROTHENBERG.
Plaintiff, Maria Ruscitti, appeals the summary judgment entered in favor of defendants, Gilbert M. Sackheim and Day and Sackheim (a law partnership), upon Ruscit-ti’s claims for conversion, outrageous conduct, and deprivation of property in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). We affirm.
The relevant facts are undisputed. Sack-heim, an attorney and a principal of the law firm of Day and Sackheim, represented Carl Nukols in a civil action against Emili-ano and Linda Ruscitti, the husband and daughter of plaintiff Maria Ruscitti. In September 1987, Sackheim obtained a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. KeenanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Jones v. DresselSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Rugg v. McCartySupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
- Quaranto v. SilvermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- D.R. Horton, Inc.-Denver v. D & S Landscaping, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
- GF Conservation v. GuireColorado Court of Appeals · 2024
- GF Conservation v. GuireColorado Court of Appeals · 2024