Legal Opinion
Hill v. Wackenhut Services International
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 7, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2011-2158PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMES E. BOASBERG, District Judge.
Plaintiffs were employed by Defendant Wackenhut Services LLC as firefighters in Iraq and Afghanistan. They brought this action against Wackenhut and its affiliates, as well as against other companies, alleging that they were unlawfully denied various forms of employment benefits and compensation, such as in-country and overtime pay. The Wackenhut Defendants have now filed a Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Litigation, arguing that the claims set forth in Plaintiffs’ Complaint are subject to a mandatory-arbitration provision in their…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Haire v. Smith, Currie & Hancock LLPDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Fox v. Computer World Services Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- McMullen v. Synchrony BankDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Mercadante v. Xe Services, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Ruiz v. Millennium Square Residential AssociationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.