Legal Opinion

In Re Bahn

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 3, 2000No. 2-99-388-CVPublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SAM J. DAY, Justice.

I. Introduction

Relator Rayne Bahn filed his petition for writ of mandamus on the grounds that the trial court abused its discretion in entering orders disqualifying his attorneys from representing him both at trial and in pretrial matters. We will conditionally grant relator’s petition for writ of mandamus as to that portion of the order disqualifying Steven Phelps (“Phelps”) from pretrial representation and as to the order disqualifying Marguerite Broussard (“Brous-sard”). Otherwise, we will deny the petition.

II. Factual and Procedural Background

Relator retained…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Tenneco Inc. v. Enterprise Products Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Rogers v. Ricane Enterprises, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Canadian Helicopters Ltd. v. WittigTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Rivercenter Associates v. RiveraTexas Supreme Court · 1993

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Glattly v. Air Starter Components, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
  2. In Re HinterlongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
  3. Robert Droste Claudia Droste v. Douglas JulienCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  4. In Re Goodman, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2007
  5. In Re ExxonMobil Production Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2011

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API