Legal Opinion
Maroun v. Tarro
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 9, 1994No. 12209PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
The named defendant appeals from a $45,000 jury verdict for the substitute plaintiff in this conversion action.1 The defendant claims that the trial *393court (1) improperly denied his motions for a directed verdict and his motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, (2) improperly failed to set aside the plaintiffs verdict because the evidence did not support the award of damages, and (3) improperly denied the defendant’s motion in limine to preclude the plaintiff from introducing certain exhibits. We reverse the judgment of the trial court.2
The jury reasonably could have found the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Petyan v. EllisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Puro v. HenrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Bound Brook Ass'n v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Bleich v. OrtizSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Coleman v. FrancisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Foley v. Huntington Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Suarez-Negrete v. TrottaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Outlaw v. City of MeridenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Lawson v. Whitey's Frame ShopConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Howard v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.