Legal Opinion

Outlaw v. City of Meriden

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 1, 1996No. 14794; 14974PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

The defendants1 appeal from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury trial, in favor of the plaintiff, Guy Outlaw. The plaintiff cross appeals challenging the summary judgment in favor of the defendants as to count one of the plaintiffs revised complaint.

The defendants claim that the trial court improperly (1) denied their motions to set aside the verdict and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict in that the defendants could not be found liable for false imprisonment or false arrest because the plaintiff was lawfully restrained and (2) instructed the jury as to the principles…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Davis v. SchererSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Martinez v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Oliveira v. MayerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  5. Berry v. LoiseauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Russo v. City Of BridgeportCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  2. Russo v. City of BridgeportCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  3. Chase v. Nodine's Smokehouse, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
  4. El Badrawi v. Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
  5. Holman v. CascioDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API