Legal Opinion
Dixon v. Hawkins
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 9, 1936No. 26296PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCorn, J.
Louis Eischl was appointed administrator of the estate of Martha Pratt, deceased, by the county court, of Carter county, and gave his bond with the Globe Indemnity Company as surety. At the end of this matter there was an order entered by the county court of Carter county in which it was ordered and directed that said administrator pay to Louis Perkins, within 30 days from date of said order, the sum of $1,138.61. The administrator failed to pay this sum, and Pauline Hawkins, as the administratrix of the estate of Louis Perkins, deceased, and on the 28th day of November, 1933, filed her suit…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hart v. ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Hetland v. BilstadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Hanson v. KlineSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Schumaker v. . MatherNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- State ex rel. American Freehold-Land Mortgage Co. of London v. TannerWashington Supreme Court · 1907
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Maloy v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- Widger v. Union Oil Co. of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Mid-State Homes, Inc. v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Tri-State Cas. Ins. Co. v. McDuffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- State Ex Rel. Barnett v. AustinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.