Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Barnett v. Austin

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 26, 1938No. 27907PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RILEY. J.

This action was commenced by plaintiff in error to recover on a promissory note and to foreclose a mortgage given to secure said note.

The cause was tried to a jury, and since verdict and judgment were for the defendants, the parties are here in the same relation as in the trial court.

The note and mortgage were in the usual form and the petition of plaintiff set forth the execution of the note and mortgage and alleged nonpayment.

The amended answer of defendants, upon which the cause was tried, admitted the execution of the note and mortgage. Defendants specifically deny that they or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Thomas v. RauerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  2. Dixon v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mid-State Homes, Inc. v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  2. Wood & Co. v. State Ex Rel. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API