Allaby v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.
The only question on this appeal is whether there is credible evidence to sustain the commission’s finding that at the time of the injury Roy Rogers was an employee of the plaintiff Allaby within the provisions of the compensation act-of this state. A review of the record discloses credible evidence which fairly admits of finding the fqllowing facts: Allaby was the owner of extensive timber lands upon which he was engaged in logging operations to cut timber for veneer logs and for ties. He employed a number of men, including a foreman, Blackburn, and a camp cook, whom he paid on a time basis.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Habrich v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
- Kneeland-McLurg Lumber Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Komula v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
- Medford Lumber Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
3Cited by11 opinions
- Tesch v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- Montello Granite Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- Kolman v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- Green Valley Co-Operative Dairy Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
- Le Sage v. Le SageWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.