Legal Opinion

Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Edgar L.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 29, 1997No. S055368PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

In In re Carmen O. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 908, 921 [33 Cal.Rptr.2d 848] (Carmen O.), the Court of Appeal created what it called a “child dependency hearsay exception” (sometimes the child dependency exception). This exception allows, under certain conditions, admission of out-of-court statements by alleged victims of child sexual abuse during a hearing to determine whether a child is a dependent of the juvenile court. (See Welf. & Inst. Code, § 300.)1 In the present case we are called upon to determine whether the child dependency exception is applicable when the court decides…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. State v. SwanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. People v. WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. People v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Roberts v. City of PalmdaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. People v. AyalaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Kulshrestha v. First Union Commercial Corp.California Supreme Court · 2004
  4. In Re Lucero L.California Supreme Court · 2000
  5. San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Christopher T.California Court of Appeal · 2012

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API