Legal Opinion
San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Christopher T.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 26, 2012No. D062087PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NARES, Acting P. J.
Christopher T. and Samantha T. are the parents of Hailey T. and Nathan T., who were adjudicated as dependents of the juvenile court under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivisions (a) and (j).1 The parents appeal the dispositional order under section 361, subdivision (c)(1), removing the older child from their custody, contending the evidence was insufficient to support the removal order, and there were reasonable alternatives short of removal to protect the child.2
*142FACTS
On February 14, 2012, the maternal grandmother watched Hailey, then three years old,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cynthia D. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Renee J. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re Laura F.California Supreme Court · 1983
- In Re Jamie M.California Court of Appeal · 1982
- In Re Jeannette v. MargeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- T. J. v. Superior Court of City & Cnty. of S.F., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. M.J.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Conservatorship of O.B.California Supreme Court · 2020
- Conservatorship of O.B.California Supreme Court · 2020
- In re A.T. CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2020
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.