Legal Opinion

Lionetti v. Coppola

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 9, 1932PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.

The jury might reasonably have found the following facts: An automobile truck operated by Michael Coppola, hereafter called the defendant, and one operated by Carmine Lionetti were in an election night parade in Stamford November 4th, 1930. After the parade broke up the two trucks proceeded along Stillwater Avenue and turned into Spruce Street, which intersects it at right angles, Lionetti’s truck then being ahead. Spruce Street is about twenty-four feet wide between curbs. It was or had been raining that night and it was somewhat misty and drizzly and the pavement was wet. Spruce Street at…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bordonaro v. SenkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  2. Shailer v. BullockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
  3. Skaling v. SheedySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
  4. Sadinsky v. CoughlinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  5. Rich v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1918

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Williams v. CarrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Schaller v. Roadside Inn, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
  3. Smith v. FurnessSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  4. Heslin v. MaloneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  5. Decker v. RobertsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API