Legal Opinion
Decker v. Roberts
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 5, 1939PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAvery, J.
These two cases were tried together. They were brought to recover damages for injuries claimed to have been caused in a collision of two automobiles at an intersection. Independent actions were brought by both parties. In one action, the plaintiff was Harold Decker and the defendant David W. Roberts, in the other the parties were reversed. The jury returned verdicts in favor of Decker in both cases and Roberts has appealed.
Taking the view of the evidence most favorable to Decker, the jury might reasonably have found the facts as follows: The Colebrook South Sandisfield Road runs north and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bordonaro v. SenkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Ziman v. WhitleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Menzie v. KalmonowitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
- Pietrycka v. SimolanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Matthiessen v. VanechSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. AlterioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Mooney v. WabrekSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Birdsall v. City of HartfordDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2003
- Belanger v. Village Pub I, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.