Legal Opinion
Smith v. Furness
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 20, 1933PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
Except in. one respect, the issues presented in these two appeals are the same and we shall discuss those common to both in connection with the appeal in the action brought by Cora Belle Smith. She sought a recovery for injuries received in an accident while riding as a guest in an automobile driven by one defendant, Irene Frances Furness, and owned by the other defendant, Frank W. Furness. The complaint alleged that the plaintiff was a passenger and guest in the automobile and she evidently was seeking a recovery under the “guest statute” so-called.. General Statutes, § 1628. The defendants…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bordonaro v. SenkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Plumb v. CurtisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
- Alexander v. R. A. Sherman's Sons Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- Fisher, Brown & Co. v. FieldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
- Freedman v. HurwitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Antman v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Rizzuto v. Davidson Ladders, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Jensen v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Cook v. LawlorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Trichilo v. TrichiloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.