Legal Opinion
Pope v. Pope
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 12, 1926No. 16555PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
THREADGILL, G
On August 18, 1924, this action was commenced by defendant in error, as plaintiff, against plaintiff in error, as defendant, to obtain a •divorce and to restrain defendant from “in any manner interfering with her.” The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.
The ground alleged in the petition was extreme cruelty. On September! 18, 1924, plaintiff filed an amended petition, in which she alleged that she was a resident for more than one year of Osage county, and stated facts showing fraud and undue influence on the part of defendant and his…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pelham Petroleum Co. v. NorthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Beach v. BeachSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896
- Gorman v. CarlockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Irwin v. IrwinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
- Jones v. ReserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Box v. State Election Board of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- Rakestraw v. RakestrawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- Greer v. GreerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- McElreath v. McElreathSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.