Rakestraw v. Rakestraw
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKBIRD, Justice.
The plaintiff in error and defendant in error will hereinafter be referred to as defendant and plaintiff, respectively, as they appeared in the trial court. The divorce decree involved here directed the plaintiff, a petty officer in the Navy, to pay defendant’s attorney’s fees, awarded her custody of, and support for, the couple’s minor child, and granted the divorce to both parties on the ground of incompatibility, after a finding that they were both at fault.
In her present appeal from the decree, defendant argues, under her third proposition of error, that the trial court…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Burch v. BurchCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- Saltzgaver v. SaltzgaverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
- Chavez v. ChavezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1935
- Chappell v. ChappellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Pope v. PopeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hughes v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Aronson v. AronsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- Waller v. WallerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- J. A. D. v. P. L. D.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1969
- Shearer v. ShearerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.