Legal Opinion

Rakestraw v. Rakestraw

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 27, 1959No. 38288PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBIRD, Justice.

The plaintiff in error and defendant in error will hereinafter be referred to as defendant and plaintiff, respectively, as they appeared in the trial court. The divorce decree involved here directed the plaintiff, a petty officer in the Navy, to pay defendant’s attorney’s fees, awarded her custody of, and support for, the couple’s minor child, and granted the divorce to both parties on the ground of incompatibility, after a finding that they were both at fault.

In her present appeal from the decree, defendant argues, under her third proposition of error, that the trial court…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Burch v. BurchCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
  2. Saltzgaver v. SaltzgaverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  3. Chavez v. ChavezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Chappell v. ChappellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  5. Pope v. PopeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hughes v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  2. Aronson v. AronsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  3. Waller v. WallerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  4. J. A. D. v. P. L. D.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1969
  5. Shearer v. ShearerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API