Legal Opinion
Royal Mortgage Corp. v. Montague
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided April 5, 2001No. 2-99-329-CVPublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID L. RICHARDS, Justice (Assigned).
Introduction
Royal Mortgage Company (“Royal”) brought suit against seventeen named defendants, asserting causes of action for negligence, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, and DTPA violations arising out of a transaction for the sale of debt instruments called the Park Cities Properties Package (“Park Cities”). Ap-pellees include eight Mississippi residents and companies who were dismissed from the suit after the trial court sustained their special appearance motions.
Factual Background
Mortgage Resources, Inc. (“Mortgage…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Guardian Royal Exchange Assurance, Ltd. v. English China Clays, P.L.C.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
- CSR LTD. v. LinkTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Schlobohm v. SchapiroTexas Supreme Court · 1990
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Michiana Easy Livin' Country, Inc. v. HoltenTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Walker Insurance Services v. Bottle Rock Power Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
- El Puerto De Liverpool, S.A. De C v. v. Servi Mundo Llantero S.A. De C.V., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
- SITQ E.U., Inc. v. Reata Restaurants, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Glattly v. CMS Viron Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.