Legal Opinion

McKinnon v. Tambrands, Inc.

District Court, D. Utah

Decided March 3, 1993No. 1:92-cr-00035PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER

WINDER, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on the Motion for Summary Judgment brought by defendant Tambrands, Inc. (“Defendant”) on the strict product liability claims of plaintiff Lee Ann McKinnon (“Plaintiff’). 1 A hearing on the motion was held on February 3, 1993. Defendant was represented by Gary B. Ferguson. Plaintiff was represented by Joseph M. Bean. Before the hearing, the court considered carefully the memoranda and other materials submitted by the parties. After the hearing, the court took the matter under advisement. Since that time, the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Maughan v. SW Servicing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McCollin v. Synthes Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 1999
  2. Strickland v. General Motors Corp.District Court, D. Utah · 1994
  3. Bridgewaters v. Toro Co.District Court, D. Utah · 1993
  4. Mecham v. C. R. Bard, Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 2020
  5. Skinner v. Ethicon, Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API