Legal Opinion
Bridgewaters v. Toro Co.
District Court, D. Utah
Decided April 29, 1993No. Civ. 91-CV-1261 APublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
• ORDER DENYING TORO COMPANY’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ALDON J. ANDERSON, Senior District Judge.
Defendant Toro Company (hereafter “Toro”) has asked this court, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, to grant summary judgment dismissing the product liability complaint of plaintiff Corinne Bridgewaters (hereafter “Bridgewaters”) because of the alleged applicability of Utah’s two year product liability statute of limitations, Utah Code Anno. § 78-15-3 (1992). Bridgewaters opposed the motion, and oral argument was heard.
Having carefully considered the matter, and having undertaken its…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Berry by and Through Berry v. Beech AircraftUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Wilson v. IsemingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Larson v. Snow CollegeDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2000
- Strickland v. General Motors Corp.District Court, D. Utah · 1994
- In Re Commercial Explosives LitigationDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1996
- Larson v. Snow CollegeDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2000