Legal Opinion

State v. Tirado

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 17, 1993No. 90-4279-C; CA A69172PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants. ORS 813.010. The issue is whether the state proved venue in Jackson County. We reverse.

At the close of the state’s case, defendant moved for a judgment of acquittal, contending that the state had failed to establish venue. The court denied the motion. Venue must be established beyond a reasonable'doubt. Or Const, Art I, § 11; State v. O’Neall, 115 Or App 62, 66, 836 P2d 758, rev den 314 Or 574 (1992). The state may prove venue through either direct or circumstantial evidence. State v. Miranda, 309 Or 121, 130,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. MirandaOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. CookseyOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  4. State v. KacalekCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. State v. O'NEALLCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. CervantesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. State v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. State v. CervantesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. State v. CervantesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API