Legal Opinion

State v. Miranda

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1990No. CC C87-03-31650; SC S34970PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

This is a case of automatic review of a conviction of aggravated murder and sentence of death. Defendant challenges both his conviction and the resulting sentence. We find his extensive arguments concerning the guilt phase not well taken and affirm his conviction for aggravated murder. We find the sentencing proceeding to be inadequate for the reasons set forth in our opinion in State v. Wagner, 309 Or 5, 786 P2d 93 (1990), and so remand the case to the circuit court for a new sentencing proceeding.

FACTS

The relevant facts of this case are that defendant Miranda and co-defendant Nefstad met…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. State v. MoenOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. FarrarOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. IsomOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. WagnerOregon Supreme Court · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. GuzekOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. CervantesOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. TuckerOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. NefstadOregon Supreme Court · 1990

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API