State v. Kacalek
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of driving under the influence of intoxicants, ORS 487.540. He contends his motion for acquittal should have been granted because the state failed to prove venue. His second contention is the results of the breathalyzer test should have been excluded because the operator did not examine the inside of defendant’s mouth prior to administering the test.
Defendant was arrested in Hubbard, Oregon. The arresting officer testified he was a Marion County Sheriff’s Deputy and was in uniform on routine patrol in Hubbard, Oregon. He observed the defendant…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. CookseyOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- State v. LedderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
- Buchholz v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. BaldersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- State v. CervantesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- State v. McClaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.