Legal Opinion

TYR Sport, Inc. v. Warnaco Swimwear, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided March 16, 2010No. Case SACV 08-529 JVS (MLGx)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FINAL ORDER RE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

JAMES V. SELNA, District Judge.

Defendant Warnaco Swimwear, Inc., dba Speedo USA, (“Speedo”) moves for summary judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 on the remaining claims for relief asserted against it by Plaintiff TYR Sport, Inc. (“TYR”). Defendants United States Swimming, Inc. (“USA Swimming”) and Mark Schubert (“Schubert”) also move for summary judgment under Rule 56 on TYR’s remaining claims. Speedo and USA Swimming and Schubert (collectively, “Defendants”) join each others’ respective motions. TYR opposes both motions.

I. BACKGROUND

TY…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. L.A. Taxi Cooperative, Inc. v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API