Lytle v. Doyle
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, David Lytle, Jeanette Ly-tle, and Joan Maguire (collectively, the “Lytles”), have challenged the constitutionality of Virginia Code Section 46.2-930, which prohibits loitering on bridges designated by the Commonwealth’s Commissioner of Transportation. The Lytles initially filed this action on August 27,1999 to enjoin the enforcement of the statute on the grounds that it violates their First and Fourteenth Amendment rights. On November 2, 1999, the court issued an Opinion and Order granting the preliminary injunction. Currently pending…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lytle v. DoyleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- Brown v. MitchellDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004
- Gallimore ex rel. W.S.G. v. Henrico County School BoardDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014
- Jaynes v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2006
- David Lytle Jeanette Lytle Joan Maguire v. Jack Doyle, in His Official Capacity as Norfolk Commonwealth Attorney Commissioner, of Transportation of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and City of Norfolk, Virginia, David Lytle Jeanette Lytle Joan Maguire v. City of Norfolk, Virginia, and Jack Doyle, in His Official Capacity as Norfolk Commonwealth Attorney Commissioner, of Transportation of the Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.