Legal Opinion

Lytle v. Doyle

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided April 14, 2003No. Nos. 02-1056, 02-1076PublishedCited by 494 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge MICHAEL and Judge KING joined.

OPINION

WILKINSON, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs David Lytle, Jeanette Lytle, and Joan Maguire challenge the constitutionality of Virginia Code § 46.2-930 which prohibits loitering on certain Virginia bridges. Officers from the Norfolk Police Department, relying on this statute, threatened the plaintiffs with arrest for participating in a peaceful protest on a City bridge. Although we recognize the state’s legitimate interests in public safety, the application of this anti-loitering…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. City of St. Louis v. PraprotnikSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by494 opinions

  1. Faustin v. City and CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  2. Manning v. Caldwell for City of RoanokeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
  3. Weigle v. Pifer ex rel. City of Vienna Police DepartmentDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2015
  4. Jonathan Starbuck v. Williamsburg James City County School BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
  5. Brown v. MitchellDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004

489 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API