Legal Opinion

George Martin v. Ed Smith

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 2013No. 36055PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W. JONES, Justice.

I. Nature of the Case

Appellant, Camas County, appeals an injunction granted by the district court against the enforcement of Camas County Ordinances 150 and 153, and Resolutions 96 and 103 (“2007 zoning amendments”). Camas County challenges the standing of Plaintiff-Respondent, George Martin (“Martin”), in light of this Court’s recent decision in Martin v. Camas County, 150 Idaho 508, 509-11, 248 P.3d 1243, 1244-46 (2011) (hereinafter “Martin I ”).

II. Factual and Procedural Background

The factual and procedural background of this case is the same as described in Martin I:

In…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. ZichkoIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  2. City of Osburn v. RandelIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Arnold v. Splendid BakeryIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Martin v. Camas County ex rel. Board of CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Johannsen v. UtterbeckIdaho Supreme Court · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bettwieser v. New York Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Maravilla v. J. R. Simplot Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Williamson v. Ada CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Judy Nield v. Pocatello Health ServicesIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Nield v. Pocatello Health Services, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API